| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:38 pm    Post subject: Puzzle 10/04/18 (B) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Single stepper ... and it doesn't use a chain, ALS, M-Wing, W-Wing, extension, transport, or pseudocell.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   +-----------------------+
 
 | 4 2 . | . . 9 | 3 8 . |
 
 | 3 5 . | . . 6 | 2 . . |
 
 | . . 8 | 4 . . | 7 . . |
 
 |-------+-------+-------|
 
 | . . 3 | 9 7 . | 5 6 . |
 
 | . . . | 6 . . | . . . |
 
 | 6 7 . | . . . | . . . |
 
 |-------+-------+-------|
 
 | 7 8 1 | 3 . . | . 5 . |
 
 | 5 . . | 8 . . | 1 3 . |
 
 | . . . | . . . | . . 8 |
 
 +-----------------------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				One Step: 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | ur 15 r9c68<>2, r9c68<>4 | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:17 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Sometimes I get impatient to share. That turns out to be especially true with this puzzle. Please forgive me for not waiting longer for others to post a message.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   after basics
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 |  4       2       7       | *15     *15      9       |  3       8       6       |
 
 |  3       5       9       |  7       8       6       |  2       14      14      |
 
 |  1       6       8       |  4       23      23      |  7       9       5       |
 
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 
 |  28      14      3       |  9       7       1248    |  5       6       124     |
 
 |  289     149     245     |  6       12345   123458  |  48      1247    12347   |
 
 |  6       7       245     |  125     12345   123458  |  489     124     12349   |
 
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 
 |  7       8       1       |  3       2469    24      |  469     5       249     |
 
 |  5       49      246     |  8       2469    247     |  1       3       2479    |
 
 |  29      3       246     | *15+2   *15+2469 12457   |  469     247     8       |
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 # 94 eliminations remain
 
 | 	  
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  There is the <15> UR Type 3 eliminations in [r9] for <2469> => r 9c68<>24   (Dan's)
 
There is the <15> UR Type 3 eliminations in [b8] for <2469> => r89c6 <>24
 
 | 	  
 
But, most interesting of all, is r9c6=1|5 must be true to prevent the <15> DP. This results in r9c6<>247.
 
 
All of these UR eliminations result in r8c6,r9c8=7 to crack the puzzle. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:50 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | Single stepper ... and it doesn't use a chain, ALS, M-Wing, W-Wing, extension, transport, or pseudocell.  | 	  
 
Thanks for boosting my confidence. This borders on the impossible and I can't do a thing with it. I haven't read Dan's or your comments. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		peterj
 
 
  Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:56 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Danny, very neat!
 
 
I got completely waylaid looking for giant fish in 2s - so nearly a Sashimi Jellyfish (only a single in one of the columns) and a Finned Swordfish (no eliminations)....
 
 
Found this a tough puzzle! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:23 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| This puzzle was tough because of the UR being the best way to proceed (from what my solver found). I now open it up to all of the techniques originally barred. Have fun!!! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:03 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | daj95376 wrote: | 	 		  Sometimes I get impatient to share. That turns out to be especially true with this puzzle. Please forgive me for not waiting longer for others to post a message.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   after basics
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 |  4       2       7       | *15     *15      9       |  3       8       6       |
 
 |  3       5       9       |  7       8       6       |  2       14      14      |
 
 |  1       6       8       |  4       23      23      |  7       9       5       |
 
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 
 |  28      14      3       |  9       7       1248    |  5       6       124     |
 
 |  289     149     245     |  6       12345   123458  |  48      1247    12347   |
 
 |  6       7       245     |  125     12345   123458  |  489     124     12349   |
 
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 
 |  7       8       1       |  3       2469    24      |  469     5       249     |
 
 |  5       49      246     |  8       2469    247     |  1       3       2479    |
 
 |  29      3       246     | *15+2   *15+2469 12457   |  469     247     8       |
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 # 94 eliminations remain
 
 
 | 	  
 
But, most interesting of all, is r9c6=1|5 must be true to prevent the <15> DP. This results in r9c6<>247.
 
 | 	  
 
To expand on Danny's post, his statement that "r9c6=1|5" is a result of looking at the implications of the UR candidate digits on non-UR cells in the houses of the UR. Consider the following.
 
 
The two UR candidate digits are 1 & 5. We can look at the outside row, column or box implications since any one is sufficient; using row1 and row9, we find:
 
Digit 1: No outside 1s in row1; r9c6 has a 1 in row9.
 
Digit 5: No outside 5s in row1; r9c6 has a 5 in row5.
 
Thus to prevent the deadly pattern r9c6=1 or r9c6=5 from which we can conclude that r9c6<>247. 
 
Also note that in this case, looking at rows or boxes provides the exact same result. 
 
 
Looking at columns, the steps are slightly more involved but results in a more positive event.
 
Digit 1: 1s in r6c4 & r56c5
 
Digit 5: 5s in r6c4 & r56c5
 
Thus, r456c6<>1 & r56c6<>5 which makes r9c6=1, a more positive result that completes the puzzle without additional deletions.
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:47 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				To capsulate Ted's observation:
 
 
The beauty of having a Locked Pair in a UR is that it automatically eliminated the row/column and box containing it from consideration. We can then focus our attention on the row/column and box containing the remaining two cells. In this grid, that's [r9] and [b8].
 
 
This is why I always resolve basics and X-Wings before searching for a UR pattern.
 
(UR Types 4/6 need an X-Wing pattern for one candidate.) | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		peterj
 
 
  Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:52 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | daj95376 wrote: | 	 		  | This puzzle was tough because of the UR being the best way to proceed (from what my solver found). I now open it up to all of the techniques originally barred. Have fun!!! | 	  
 
 
I did manage without using your barred steps - but I was hoping for a monster fish pattern in 2s, instead a two step
 
 
 	  | Quote: | 	 		  Finned Swordfish (2) in columns r569c348 fin at r8c3; r9c1<>2
 
xy-wing(248); r5c1<>8
 
Plenty of other finned fish in there also - including a Sashimi Finned x-wing! | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:06 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | peterj wrote: | 	 		  I was hoping for a monster fish pattern in 2s ...
 
 | 	  
 
There are four (total) fish eliminations -- r56c3,r6c9,r9c1<>2 -- that can be derived through various X-Wing/Swordfish patterns after basics. Together, they are insufficient to crack the puzzle.
 
 
BTW: I noticed your use of Tarek's "Sashimi finned" preference over RonK and my choice of "Sashimi" by itself. No, I don't want to reopen that discussion in this forum.    | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		ronk
 
 
  Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:20 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | tlanglet wrote: | 	 		  Looking at columns, the steps are slightly more involved but results in a more positive event.
 
Digit 1: 1s in r6c4 & r56c5
 
Digit 5: 5s in r6c4 & r56c5
 
Thus, r456c6<>1 & r56c6<>5 which makes ... | 	  
 
As you say, at least one of r6c4=1, r56c5=1, r6c4=5 and r56c5=5 must be true. However, I don't see how your conclusions follow. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:31 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Welcome back ronk    
 
 
We now have another active member to keep my misconceptions and wanton rantings in check. He also does a much more thorough check of details than I.
 
 
Regards, Danny | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:21 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | ronk wrote: | 	 		   	  | tlanglet wrote: | 	 		  Looking at columns, the steps are slightly more involved but results in a more positive event.
 
Digit 1: 1s in r6c4 & r56c5
 
Digit 5: 5s in r6c4 & r56c5
 
Thus, r456c6<>1 & r56c6<>5 which makes ... | 	  
 
As you say, at least one of r6c4=1, r56c5=1, r6c4=5 and r56c5=5 must be true. However, I don't see how your conclusions follow. | 	  
 
Ronk,
 
 
I jumped to a conclusion after looking at only half the constraints: (1)r6c4|r56c5 - r456c6 = (1)r9c6
 
 
I totally forgot to deal with the 5s.         
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |