View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kragzy
Joined: 01 May 2007 Posts: 112 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:55 pm Post subject: 10 June |
|
|
I normally resist the uniqueness techniques but a UR on 29 became obvious so early in the piece that I could not resist - the puzzle fell apart in a couple of minutes.
I then did it a second time ignoring the UR and using my normal approach - ended up needing an XYZ wing. Took much longer the second time around. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just did it once and used the UR, consistent with my habit of taking the path of least resistance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I resisted the UR temptation (consistent with my habit of prolonging the pleasure ) and used an x-wing which opened an xyz-wing.
Hint:
The x-wing (3) in rows 5 and 9 removes 3 from c2c8 and r4c2, setting r2c8=1 and r4c2=1.
Now with the 1 gone from r4c1, there is an xyz-wing ( 3,7,8 ) in box 4 and col 3 which removes 7 from r6c3. Thus r6c4=7 and the puzzle falls apart.
Code: |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 4 6 2 | 8 3 1 | 5 7 9 |
| 5 8 9 | 26 7 4 | 1236 13 236 |
| 3 7 1 | 9 5 26 | 246 8 246 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 178 13 378 | 5 48 67 | 2346 9 2346 |
| 6 35 4 | 1 29 29 | 7 35 8 |
| 9 2 578 | 67 48 3 | 146 145 46 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 27 9 37 | 247 1 8 | 34 6 5 |
| 78 4 578 | 3 6 57 | 9 2 1 |
| 12 135 6 | 24 29 259 | 8 34 7 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
andras
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 56 Location: Mid Wales
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't see the x-wing, so went for the UR instead.
Easy, but satisfying!
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johan
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another UR solution is the 78 UR* in R48C13, which pins <5> in R5C2, all three digits marked (+) in the 78 UR are the possible solutions for avoiding the 78
deadly pattern, all three results in R5C2=5, which solves the puzzle.
Code: | +-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| 4 6 2 | 8 3 1 | 5 7 9 |
| 5 8 9 | 26 7 4 | 1236 13 236 |
| 3 7 1 | 9 5 26 | 246 8 246 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
|*78+1 13 *78+3 | 5 48 67 | 2346 9 2346 |
| 6 3=5 4 | 1 29 29 | 7 35 8 |
| 9 2 578 | 67 48 3 | 146 145 46 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| 27 9 37 | 247 1 8 | 34 6 5 |
|*78 4 *78+5 | 3 6 57 | 9 2 1 |
| 12 135 6 | 24 29 259 | 8 34 7 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+ |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are x wings for <3> and <7> which exposed the UR on <78>. But I concede the straightforward route is the UR on <29>. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like the UR here, especially if you use the draw/play, you need to take care of some box line stuff first, then it just all falls into place. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|